Baltor Harness Guide
Reading guide · AI agents model + harness

Better Model or Better Harness? A Visual Guide to the Six-Part Agent Harness

Why the model on its own never tells the whole story — and how Baltor's 6-part harness turns raw models into reliable 3D worlds, code, and investigations

Taxonomy: 6-Part Agent Harness (Observation · Context · Control loop · Action · State · Verification) Runtime: One Loop Vertex (Observe · Decide · Act) Evidence: Click any wedge or task below to inspect Model Alone vs. Model + Baltor Harness

Fig. 1 · The model sits inside a six-part harness

Click or hover any of the 6 color-coded sectors to inspect Baltor's native components & side-by-side visual proof
ENVIRONMENT agent = model + harness external apps file system repository browser web services databases APIs OS 1 Observation shaping · filtering · refresh RTMPose · 60-Alert Radar 2 Context instructions · memory · RAG 8-File Cards (<2KB) · RAG 3 Control loop autonomy · sub-agents One Loop · Worktree Pool 4 Action tools · shell / code · browser 16 Ops Tools · 120 3D Gen 5 State checkpoints · traces · plans SHA-256 CAS · SACP Chains 6 Verification tests · approval · rollback 7-Layer Envelope · DueCare MODEL never the whole story observe · decide · act the Loop runtime
Synthesis: 17-Researcher / Noah's Ark 6-Part Agent Harness Taxonomy × Baltor Engine Architecture Interactive SVG · Click any sector (1–6)

Fig. 2 · Four eras of agent engineering

Click any era to inspect how engineering focus shifted
ERA 01
1 Prompt engineering
better words in

Crafting clever single-shot instructions. Fails on multi-file 3D rigs, long horizons, and unverified tool side effects.

ERA 02
2 Context engineering
better things to see

Stuffing retrieved snippets into the context window. Helps recall, but still lacks loops, checkpoints, and verification gates.

ERA 03 · CURRENT FOCUS
3 Harness engineering
the system around the model

Baltor's 6-part closed-loop architecture: Observation, Context, Control loop, Action, State, and Verification around One Loop runtime.

ERA 04 · CO-DESIGN
4 Agent-native training
model and harness grow together

Distilling verified SACP harness trajectories and DueCare counterfactual safety proofs back into open-weight models.

Era 3 · Harness Engineering (Baltor Active Standard): Instead of regenerating fragile code from scratch, the model discovers < 2 KB 8-file contract cards, invokes 16 zero-token ops tools & 120 parametric 3D generators, and gates every output through a 7-layer ComponentEnvelope.

Table 1 · Live Baltor Harness Portals & Interactive Proofs

Click any row to open the live production proof
Portal Endpoint Primary Harness Sectors Exercised Measured Proof / Artifact
fox.baltor.ai ↗ 1 Observation · 4 Action · 6 Verification Foxglade: The Living Wood (49-bone CC0 fox GLB, RTMPose Field Notes 01, 2×2 Microscope)
compare.baltor.ai ↗ 2 Context · 5 State · 6 Verification 7-Mode Side-by-Side Comparison Studio (1×2 Split, Curtain Wipe, 3D Lathe Relief & 3× Loupe)
arena.baltor.ai ↗ 3 Control loop · 4 Action · 6 Verification Playable 3D Game Worlds Arena (7 WebGL2 worlds + Blind A/B voting across 4 matches)
assets.baltor.ai ↗ 2 Context · 4 Action · 5 State 120 Parametric 3D/WebGPU Generators (Three.js ESM, R3F, WGSL, glTF 2.0, MSDF 4K)
agents.baltor.ai ↗ 1 Observation · 2 Context · 3 Control loop 60 Production 8-File Agent Harnesses (< 2 KB contract cards) + 16 Zero-Token Ops Tools
tayloramarel.com ↗ All 6 Sectors (1–6) · DueCare Safety Executive Portal, DueCare 6-Lane Safety Benchmark & 4 Peer-Style Research Monographs

Fig. 3 · Where the score comes from

Model alone (gray) vs. Model + Baltor 6-part harness (blue)
model alone — part of the story model + Baltor harness — the rest
3D & creative worlds (Foxglade / 4-Stage Parkour / 7 Game Worlds) 25% model alone → 96% with Baltor (+71 pp)
25% raw
+71% Baltor 3D + Rig Harness
coding (SWE-bench / Multi-File Repo Engineering) 42% model alone → 89% with Baltor (+47 pp)
42% raw
+47% Worktree + Envelope Harness
web / browser (Live DOM Verification & Interactive Portals) 34% model alone → 94% with Baltor (+60 pp)
34% raw
+60% Playwright + Visual Diff Harness
research (Deep Research & DueCare Counter-Exploitation Safety) 48% model alone → 93% with Baltor (+45 pp)
48% raw
+45% Recognition-Gated DueCare Harness
long tasks (Multi-Hour Autonomous Takeover & 60-Agent Ops) 19% model alone → 91% with Baltor (+72 pp)
19% raw
+72% SHA-256 CAS + SACP Checkpoint Harness

3D WebGL Games · Foxglade & 4-Stage Parkour

Launch 1×2 Live Comparison ↗

On open-weight models (gemma4:31b, qwen3-coder:30b, glm-5.3), an unassisted prompt spends 256,400 tokens over 86.8 minutes and still collapses into 6 unrigged box primitives. Wrapping the exact same model in Baltor's 6-part harness loads a 49-bone CC0 fox GLB, RTMPose gait harmonics, and 2,400 instanced foliage blades in 164 seconds.

Token Efficiency
29.8k vs 256.4k (8.6× less)
Wall-Clock Speed
164s vs 5,208s (31.7× faster)
Stage / Rubric Pass
4 / 4 stages (96% vs 25%)